Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's score of 77. Although it's the best phone in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is notably thicker and noticeably heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit sharper display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of display. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.