Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a overall score of 81 against 77. These devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should give you the same operating system features. Even being the best in this comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is a way thicker and heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little inferior pixel count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger screen. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot better (4K) video resolution and a camera with way more MP.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a really longer battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.