Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting an 88.5 score against 77. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is just a little thinner but just a little heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11, giving you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Galaxy Z Flip has as much memory capacity for games and applications as OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, both of them have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.