Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, getting a general score of 92.3 against 77. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is just a little heavier but a little thinner than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide you the same OS features.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller display. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G and Galaxy Z Flip 5G have similar memory capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G's processing unit is very similar to the processor in OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, and although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.