Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 global score. Both phones we are comparing here have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is a little thinner but much heavier than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G count with really similar storage to install applications and games, both have the same internal storage.
Galaxy Z Fold 2's processor is very similar to the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G one, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 12 GB RAM. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a way better battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a slightly better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photography and video and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.