Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Nano SIM Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact is a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a 79 score against 77. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact design is just a little lighter but noticeably thicker than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. These phones include Android operating system, but the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11, providing the user some additional features.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a slightly better display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, less bright display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little faster processor than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a quite bigger storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a way better battery life than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.