Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 general score. IPhone X is a somewhat lighter and thinner device than OSCAL Tiger 13. IPhone X has an incredibly better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a way better count of pixels per inch of display.
Apple iPhone X has a bit superior CPU than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a very superior memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 2 TB.
The Apple iPhone X shoots much clearer videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.