Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13, having a global score of 82 against 73.4. IPhone XR is a just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than OSCAL Tiger 13. Apple iPhone XR has a greater processing power than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has less CPU cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone XR features a much better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel count per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 828 x 1792px resolution. The iPhone XR features a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 2 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.