Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS has an overall score of 84.2, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's global score of 73.4. The Apple iPhone XS design is somewhat thinner and lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a much more vibrant screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater display pixels density and a way higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
IPhone XS counts with a more powerful CPU than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Apple iPhone XS captures much better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features much more memory capacity for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that holds up to 2 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.