Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's general score of 73.4. Google Pixel's construction has the same thickness than OSCAL Tiger 13, but it's notably lighter. The Google Pixel counts with a more vivid screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a lot greater pixel amount per inch in the display.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 2 TB and more internal memory.
Google Pixel features a better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot lower 12.3 MP resolution back camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.