Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a general score of 82.5 against 73.4. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Google Pixel 2 XL features a much better display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better screen pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 2 TB. Google Pixel 2 XL's processor is just as good as the CPU in OSCAL Tiger 13, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.