Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 overall score. The Google Pixel 3a body is a little thinner and noticeably lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
The Google Pixel 3a has a sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a lot better screen pixel density. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 2 TB and more internal memory.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a larger amount of RAM. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a takes much better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with a way worse resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.