Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. Google Pixel 4a's construction is just a bit thinner and much lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
OSCAL Tiger 13 and Google Pixel 4a both have extremely similar processing units, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Google Pixel 4a counts with a much better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and much more pixels per inch in the screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. Google Pixel 4a features a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.