Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a global score of 89 against 73.4. The Google Pixel 5 design is a bit thinner and extremely lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Google Pixel 5 features a bit superior processor than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 8 GB of RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 features a better display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixels amount per screen inch and a much better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 2 TB and more internal memory capacity.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has greater battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh. Google Pixel 5 captures much clearer photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera with lot less MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.