Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 262 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, having a score of 80.8 against 73.4. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. Nokia XR20 is a thicker and incredibly heavier phone than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Nokia XR20 has a more vivid display than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Nokia XR20 also has a greater pixels density and a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Nokia XR20, because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a little bit better processing power than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Nokia XR20 shoots way better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with a lower 48 MP resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features just a bit better battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.