Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 is slightly better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a overall score of 76.1 against 73.4. These phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 has the older 12 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy A22 design is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A22 has just a bit better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 720 x 1600 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also counts with a little greater pixels density.
Galaxy A22 takes better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lesser MP resolution back camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A22, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 2 TB and 256 GB internal memory.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.