Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a general score of 79.9 against 73.4. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding operating system features. Galaxy A25 5G's body is a little thinner and just a little lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A25 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of them have a same resolution back camera.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 and the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G both count with extremely similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.