Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 is better than OSCAL Tiger 13, having a score of 81.3 against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy A31 construction has the same thickness than OSCAL Tiger 13, but it's just a bit lighter. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A31 has the previous 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A31 counts with a brighter screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot better pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera in the back with a lower 48 mega pixels resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A31, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A31's battery performance is just as good as the OSCAL Tiger 13 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.