Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 13 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, with a general score of 82.9 against 73.4. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A34 has the older 13 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a extremely thinner and notably lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Galaxy A34 has a much better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher number of pixels per inch of display and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A34, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB and 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A34 features a little bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy A34's battery duration is very similar to the battery lifetime in OSCAL Tiger 13. Galaxy A34 counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.