Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a little bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a 79.4 score against 73.4. These phones include the same Android 14 operating system. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a just a little bit heavier but a little bit thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The Galaxy A35 5G features a brighter screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much better performance than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of them have a back facing camera with a 50 mega-pixels. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's battery performance is very similar to the OSCAL Tiger 13 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.