Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A40 has a score of 79.6, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 global score. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A40 has older 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy A40 body is just a bit thinner and extremely lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A40 has a sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way greater display density.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A40, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 2 TB. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much better battery duration than Galaxy A40, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A40 captures much clearer photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot worse 16 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.