Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Prism Dot black, Prism Dot grey and Prism Dot white |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A42 has a global score of 87, which is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 global score. Galaxy A42 is a just a little bit lighter device than OSCAL Tiger 13, but both are 0.34inches thick. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A42 has 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A42, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A42 counts with a display that is just as good as the OSCAL Tiger 13 one, because although the Galaxy A42 has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 720 x 1600px resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density.
The Galaxy A42 shoots a lot better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a worse resolution camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A42, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 128 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A42 counts with a battery life that's very similar to the battery performance in OSCAL Tiger 13.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.