Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has an overall score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) is a a little thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 13. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) counts with a more vivid display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way higher pixel density and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Galaxy A5 (2017) takes much clearer photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a way less MP resolution camera in the back.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 2 TB and 224 GB more internal storage. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.