Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, having an 83.8 score against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a thinner and lighter device than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Samsung Galaxy A50's CPU is very similar to the OSCAL Tiger 13 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.