Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, having an 86.6 score against 73.4. The Galaxy A50s design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a brighter display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher display density and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 2 TB and 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A50s features a little better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a greater camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a less mega-pixels resolution camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.