Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a score of 90.8 against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a a little bit lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 13, but both of them are equally thin. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy A51 5G's processing unit is just as good as OSCAL Tiger 13's CPU, and although the Galaxy A51 5G has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A51 5G has a brighter display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot more pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A51 5G takes way better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lesser megapixels back-facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 2 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.