Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 score. Galaxy A52's body is just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher display pixel density and a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A52, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the CPU in OSCAL Tiger 13, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A52 takes much better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.