Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's score of 73.4. The Galaxy A52 5G is a a bit thinner and just a little lighter phone than OSCAL Tiger 13. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A52 5G features a much better display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much higher count of pixels per screen inch. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and OSCAL Tiger 13 both feature incredibly similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A52 5G has a way better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.