Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) is slightly better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with a score of 75.8 against 73.4. The Galaxy A7 (2017) body is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than OSCAL Tiger 13. The Galaxy A7 (2017) features just a bit better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 224 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 2 TB. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A7 (2017) features a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.