Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, having a score of 79.2 against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is a a little bit thinner and lighter device than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a more vivid screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2220 resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 192 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) captures much clearer photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera with a way lower resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.