Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 13's general score of 73.4. Galaxy A9 (2018) is a just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter phone than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Galaxy A9 (2018) features a more vivid display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution and a greater pixels density.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 2 TB. The Galaxy A9 (2018)'s processing unit is just as good as OSCAL Tiger 13's processor, and although the Galaxy A9 (2018) has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 32 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.