Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a score of 76.3, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 score. The Samsung Galaxy Alpha construction is noticeably thinner and extremely lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Alpha has a newer 4.4.4 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version, so it gives some nice extra features and better performance.
The Galaxy Alpha has just a bit better processing power than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. Galaxy Alpha counts with a better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1280 x 720 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density.
The Galaxy Alpha takes better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a way less megapixels back camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 2 TB and 224 GB more internal memory.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.