Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C5 is slightly better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a overall score of 76.4 against 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy C5 body is extremely lighter and notably thinner than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy C5 has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy C5, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy C5 features a sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater count of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy C5 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a way less mega-pixels resolution camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C5, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 2 TB and 192 GB more internal memory.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much better battery performance than Galaxy C5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.