Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C7 is a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, having a 77.7 score against 73.4. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy C7 has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy C7 body is lighter and way thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 counts with a bit more vivid display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy C7, because it has more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a little better performance than Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy C7 counts with a slightly better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot lower 16 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy C7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.