Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 8.36 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's score of 73.4. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has the older 12 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy F23's construction is just a little thinner and incredibly lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Galaxy F23 counts with a more vivid display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of display and a way better 1080 x 2408px resolution. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F23, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 2 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a bit better processor than Galaxy F23, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy F23 features a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13. They have a 50 MP resolution back facing camera. Galaxy F23's battery duration is just as good as the battery performance in OSCAL Tiger 13.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.