Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's score of 73.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14, so it provides lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Galaxy Fold's body is much heavier but noticeably thinner than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a better display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a bit bigger screen, more pixels per display inch and a much better resolution of 1536 x 2152. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Fold, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 2 TB.
Galaxy Fold features a little faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4380mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a lot better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a way less mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.