Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, blue and white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | PLS |
| 262 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M12 is a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a global score of 80 against 73.4. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy M12 has the previous 10 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy M12 is a somewhat thicker and a little heavier device than OSCAL Tiger 13.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy M12, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has more RAM. Samsung Galaxy M12 features a screen that's just as good as OSCAL Tiger 13's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy M12 has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 720 x 1600 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M12, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M12 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with a lower resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M12 features greater battery duration than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.