Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 262 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13's score of 73.4. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M20 has older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. Galaxy M20 is a just a bit lighter but a bit thicker cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Galaxy M20 features a much better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and way more pixels per inch of screen. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy M20 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a way lower 13 mega-pixels resolution back camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M20, because it has 192 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 2 TB.
The Galaxy M20 and OSCAL Tiger 13 count with very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.