Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 262 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is better than OSCAL Tiger 13, with an 87.7 score against 73.4. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy M51 construction is just a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
Galaxy M51 has a sharper screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy M51 also has a better pixels density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Samsung Galaxy M51 and OSCAL Tiger 13 both feature really similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a lot better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a camera with lot more mega pixels. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 2 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery performance than OSCAL Tiger 13, because it has a 40% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.