Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 262 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 general score. The Galaxy Note 20 is a just a little bit lighter and a little thinner device than OSCAL Tiger 13. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit faster CPU than OSCAL Tiger 13. They have 8 processing cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a sharper screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that admits up to 2 TB.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot lower resolution back camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.