Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a score of 81.2, which is better than OSCAL Tiger 13's global score of 73.4. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 design is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
OSCAL Tiger 13 and Galaxy Note 3 have extremely similar processors, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has 4 lesser processing cores (although they are faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy Note 3 has a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080px resolution and a higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a lot less mega-pixels back-facing camera. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 192 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.