Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 4
VerizonSM-N910V
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| -- | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 269.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (825 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 20 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 4 has an overall score of 81.6, which is much better than OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 score. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 4 has older 5.0 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Note 4 body is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 features a bit more powerful processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 has a lot better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 4, because it has 224 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB. Galaxy Note 4 counts with a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.