Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has an overall score of 79.3, which is a bit better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's 73.4 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a lot better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel quantity per screen inch and a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 7 more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 5 takes better photographs and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 16 mega pixels resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.