Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is slightly better than OSCAL Tiger 13's global score of 73.4. Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a somewhat lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than OSCAL Tiger 13. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processor in OSCAL Tiger 13, and although the Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 2 TB. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.