Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 13's general score of 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a just a little thinner and lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 13. Galaxy Note10 has a sharper display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a lot better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Note10 has a bit faster processing unit than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM. The Galaxy Note10 has a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a much less mega-pixels camera. OSCAL Tiger 13 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 2 TB.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.