Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is slightly better than OSCAL Tiger 13's global score of 73.4. The Galaxy Note3 body is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14, giving you some additional features.
The Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit better looking display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a greater pixel amount in each inch of display. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 2 TB.
OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy Note3, because it has 5 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (although slower). OSCAL Tiger 13 features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 56% bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera with a much lower 13 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.