Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 is just a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a general score of 77.6 against 73.4. Galaxy Note4 is a a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The Galaxy Note4 features a more vivid screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and way more pixels per inch in the screen.
OSCAL Tiger 13 features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 2 TB and 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note4 shoots much better videos and photos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a much less MP camera in the back. The OSCAL Tiger 13 has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.