Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is a bit better than OSCAL Tiger 13, having a global score of 79.5 against 73.4. The Galaxy Note7 design is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than the OSCAL Tiger 13. The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a much better display than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixel amount per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy Note7 takes much clearer photos and videos than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution.
OSCAL Tiger 13 has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 2 TB and more internal memory. The OSCAL Tiger 13 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.