Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is way better than the OSCAL Tiger 13's overall score of 73.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S10 body is a little bit thinner and lighter than the OSCAL Tiger 13.
Galaxy S10 features a lot better screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S10 has just a bit better performance than OSCAL Tiger 13. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB and 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S10 features a very superior camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera with a much worse resolution.
The OSCAL Tiger 13 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.