Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.49 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Hurricane Black; Violet Blue | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 262 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T760 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than OSCAL Tiger 13, getting a 93.6 score against 73.4. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is a little thinner and just a bit lighter than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and OSCAL Tiger 13 has Android 14.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much sharper screen than OSCAL Tiger 13, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a lot greater number of pixels per display inch and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. OSCAL Tiger 13 features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the OSCAL Tiger 13 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit superior CPU than OSCAL Tiger 13. Both have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. OSCAL Tiger 13 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Galaxy S10 5G features a much better camera than OSCAL Tiger 13, although it has a camera with a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.